engineering question #4241



Joanna, a 52 year old female from Melbourne, Australia asks on May 3, 2008,

Q:

There are 2 routes I could take between home and work and they each take about the same amount of time to travel. One route is shorter in distance, has stoplights, roundabouts, quite a bit of traffic and is speed restricted. The other route is much longer in distance, has no lights, little traffic and is mostly 100 km/hour. While the distances involved aren't huge, over a year or 10 the accumulated impact could be significant. So, remembering that time isn't an issue here, my question is double-barrelled: which route is more economical for me (fuel-wise) and which route is more carbon-friendly?

viewed 15013 times

the answer

John Jones answered on May 9, 2008, A:

The more economical route will also be more carbon-friendly.

The best way to answer the question is to drive each of the two routes for a week and compare one's gas mileage at the end of the two weeks.

Although on first impression it might seem the shorter route is more carbon friendly, we can't conclude that the shorter route is more economical -- accelerating uses more fuel than cruising, and the shorter route will require more accelerations. The energy used in these accelerations then gets wasted as frictional heat in one's brake drums when one stops at the lights.

The only way to find out is to do an experiment and actually monitor your gas usage for a while on each route. Maybe it will take more than a week, but within a month or so you should have an answer.

Add to or comment on this answer using the form below.
(required)
(required if you would like a response)
Note: All submissions are moderated prior to posting.
If you found this answer useful, please consider making a small donation to science.ca.